Sunday, January 17, 2016

Post 21. NASA's Curiosity Rover Photographs an Image on Mars That Resembles a Pyramid

On May 7, 2015 NASA's Curiosity rover photographed what appears to be a small pyramid on the surface of Mars.  This terrain feature, if this is what it is (it may be a constructed feature), is estimated to be about the size of a small car.  Some have suggested that this pyramid actually may be the capstone of a larger pyramid that is buried at some depth beneath the Martian regolith.  However, the view taken by the writer is that this terrain feature symbolizes a pyramid-one that is found on earth.

The photograph of the pyramid, as depicted in Figure 1, clearly shows the horizon (where the surface of Mars meets the sky) a short distance behind the pyramid. This horizon also intersects the pyramid at a place near the very top of the pyramid. This area of the pyramid could be considered its capstone.  Therefore, symbolically, the pyramid depicted in Figure 1 may be a pyramid, or symbolizes a pyramid, that is associated with a capstone in some way.  This capstone may be a missing capstone.  The Great Pyramid of Giza, or Khufu's pyramid lacks a capstone. But at this point, we do not know if the pyramid photographed on Mars is the actual subject of this symbolism or if it only symbolizes another pyramid that is the subject of this symbolism.  Either of these possibilities may concern a capstone or, perhaps, a missing capstone. If this pyramid symbolizes another pyramid, is it possible that the pyramid symbolized may be one of the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau in Egypt on earth.  These are the Great Pyramid of Giza, or Khufu's pyramid, Khafre's pyramid, and Menkaura's pyramid.




Figure 1. The pyramid photographed by the Mars rover, Curiosity, on
the surface of Mars on May 7, 2015 with alignments not drawn for
better viewing of the surrounding terrain features (Courtesy of
NASA/JPL/Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems).








Figure 2. The pyramid photographed by the Mars rover, Curiosity, on
the surface of Mars on May 7, 2015 with alignments drawn.  See
Key below (Courtesy of NASA/JPL/Caltech/Malin Space Science
Systems) 


 


It may be noted in Figure 2 that an alignment connects three terrain features (the pyramid referred to above and two other terrain features that resemble pyramids, but to a lesser degree).  This supports the view that these three terrain features symbolize the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau in Egypt. The alignment referred to above is designated alignment C in Figure 2. This alignment intersects the bases of the three pyramid-like terrain features and the latter are believed to symbolize the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau.  These are designated D, E, and F in Figure 2 and are linked to alignment C at three alignment points of alignment C: points C1, C2, and C3. Because of the symbolic similarity of these three terrain features to the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau, it is assumed that this inspired source does not refer to the pyramid photographed in Figure 2 in its natural setting on Mars.  Rather, it symbolically refers to the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau. Therefore, what is learned from studying the pyramid photographed on Mars can be symbolically applied to Khafre's pyramid, the second largest of the three major pyramids of the Giza Plateau.

Turning now to alignment A, this alignment, it is believed, symbolically connects the three instruments of mystical particle transfer.  These are the helmet, the sword , and the breastplate.  In Figure 2, these three instruments are symbolized by three terrain features designated G, H, and I, respectively. Alignment point A1 is located at the terrain feature that symbolizes the helmet, point A2 is located at the terrain feature that symbolizes the sword, and point A3 is located at the terrain feature that symbolizes the breastplate.  These three instruments, it is believed, will be discovered in the vicinity of Khafre's pyramid.  The terrain feature where these instruments will be discovered is believed to be located at point A4 of alignment A and point B2 of alignment B, the latter point being collocated with the former. This terrain feature, which in Figure 1 can be seen clearly without the hindrance of alignments, is only a short distance from the south base of the pyramid that symbolizes Khafre's pyramid in Figure 2.  Although the place of the discovery of the instruments of mystical particle transfer may be the terrain feature, mentioned above, where point A4 and B2 are collocated, this may not be the place where the instruments are used to enter the interior of the earth or Khafre's pyramid. This place may be  point B3. In this regard, point B1 of alignment B is believed to mark the furthest end of the terrain feature from the pyramid, while point B2 marks the closest end of the terrain feature to the pyramid. Point B3, in this context, is the terminal point of alignment B and is located somewhere along the south or southwest base of the pyramid, itself. 

What will the operator of the instruments of mystical particle transfer and those accompanying him discover, when they travel on the mystical pathway into the interior of  Khafre's pyramid or, perhaps, the interior of the earth?  Perhaps, they will eventually arrive at a subterranean room and within this room they will find a capstone-like edifice that is not actually a capstone of a pyramid. Rather, it may be a depository of lost knowledge that will enable man to achieve the technological transformation that will be necessary for him to be prepared for the end of the present age and the beginning of the future age.  This future age is also referred to in Christian eschatology as the age to come (Mt. 12:31-32).  However, after discovering this room, it is possible the explorers will continue their journey on the mystical pathway and, eventually, discover another room. This room may contain the actual capstone of Khufu's pyramid, the Great Pyramid of Giza.  Presumably, It will contain other treasures, also.  Just as the capstone-like edifice may shed light on man's future, the capstone of Khufu's pyramid may shed light on man's past.

Although these conclusions may seem far-fetched, the symbolism of the inspired sources, Figures 1 and 2, seem to support these conclusions.  It may be noted that in the inspired source referred to above, a Mars horizon-capstone anomaly not only is present with the pyramid that is believed to symbolize Khafre's pyramid (E), it also present with the pyramid that is believed to symbolizes Khufu's pyramid (D), as well. Therefore, two Mars horizon-capstone anomalies are present in Figure 2. Does this mean that two capstones or capstone-like edifices are hidden somewhere on or beneath the Giza Plateau or in the general vicinity of the latter? When man discovers and begins to employ the instruments of mystical particle transfer, he may learn, conclusively, the answer to that question. 


Credits:

http://www.examineer.com/article/nasa-s-curiosity-rover-snaps-image-of-pyramid-found-on   6/24/2015

Readhead, Harry for Metro.co.uk   6/23/2015
(http://metro.co.uk/2015/06/23/pyramid-discovered-on-mars-by-curiosity-rover-52593621)

   




Fair Use Notice: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 
This blog distributes this material by means of this blog without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.  We believe this constitutes a fair use for any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.






















Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Post 20. The Mystery of the Disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 on March 8, 2014, and the Discovery of a Flaperon from the Missing Airliner on the Beach on Reunion Island on July 30, 2015

After searching the waters and depths of the Indian Ocean for seventeen months searching for some evidence of missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, operating a Boeing 777-200ER, that presumably crashed in the Indian Ocean on March 8, 2014, the authorities conducting this search announced that a piece of debris has been discovered washed up on the beach on French-owned Reunion Island on July 30, 2015.  The 6 foot long metal flaperon (wing flap) was covered with barnacles and other marine life, indicating that it had been in the water for a long period of time.  Investigators and other officials convened in the French city of Toulouse on August 4, 2015 where the flaperon was taken after it was flown from Reunion Island.

The prosecutor, Mackowiak, said that there were two reasons for believing that the flaperon came from the Malaysian Boeing 777: (1) Boeing has confirmed that the flaperon came from the Malaysian airliner because of the color, structure and joints; and (2) Malaysia Airlines representatives have communicated the details of the aircraft and on this basis, he said, “We can link the piece examined by experts with the Boeing 777 of Flight MH370 because of technical similarities.” He also said he hoped that further tests that would be carried out August 6, 2015 would confirm this.  In addition, Malaysian Prime Minister, Najib Rezak, speaking to journalists in Kuala Lumpur also confirmed that a “team of international experts” had confirmed that the wreckage came from Flight MH370, which he hoped would lift the ‘fog of uncertainty” for grieving relatives.

With the discovery of the flaperon of the missing Boeing 777 designated Flight MH370 on the beach of Reunion Island on July 30, 2015, it would appear that the mystery of the disappearance of Flight MH370 on March 8, 2014 has been solved.  Apparently, the aircraft ran out of fuel, crashed in the Indian Ocean, and sank to the bottom.  Then, seventeen months later, a piece of debris from the aircraft, carried by winds and currents, arrived at Reunion Island and washed up on the beach.  This would seem to be solid evidence that Flight MH370 crashed in the Indian Ocean with the loss of all aboard.  But, is this all there is to this unusual event, or is there more that we don’t know?

In Post 14 of this blog entitled The Mystery of the Disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 on March 8, 2014 from the Perspective of Inspired Sources, it was stated that living entities of an advanced interstellar civilization are believed to have captured the Boeing 777 just prior to its presumed crash in the Indian Ocean.  As stated in that post, the capture of the aircraft, it is believed, took place over the Indian Ocean west of Australia.  This account of the disappearance of the aircraft, actually, seems more reasonable that the account that has been proposed by the official investigators of this event.  Is it reasonable to believe that after seventeen months of searching for the Boeing 777 or debris from the aircraft by many aircraft and ships on the surface of the ocean, as well as on the ocean floor, and finding none at all, that a piece of the debris of the aircraft-just one piece-appears on the beach of Reunion Island on July 30, 2015.  This would certainly qualify as an anomalous event.  Perhaps, in the future, other pieces of debris from the aircraft will appear on the beach at Reunion Island.  When, and if, that occurs, this event will no longer be considered anomalous.  But that has not happened, yet.

As an alternative to the official conclusions concerning the disappearance of Flight MH370, the following account is offered.  As stated in Post 4 of this blog, it is believed that the Boeing 777 was captured by a large spaceship just prior to the time ran out of fuel and would have crashed into the Indian Ocean.   Is it possible that after the Boeing 777 had been taken aboard the large spaceship, the right flaperon was physically wrenched from the trailing edge of the right wing of the aircraft and cast into the Indian Ocean at a place where the winds and currents would carry this floating piece of debris to Reunion Island seventeen months later?  Presumably, this piece of debris was monitored by the living entities of the advanced interstellar civilization responsible for the capture of the Boeing 777, and if the piece of debris needed a change of course over time, these living entities accomplished this.  Then, one day, on July 30, 2015, this piece of debris washed up on the beach at Reunion Island.  During the seventeen months of its journey, it had attracted to it barnacles and other marine life that one would expect to be attached to it after floating on the surface of the ocean for this length of time (Figure 1).  

Figure 1.  The right flaperon of the Boeing 777 that was
operating as Flight MH370 on March 8, 2014, which was
found on the beach at Reunion Island July 30, 2015. 
Note the barnacles and other marine life adhering to this
piece of debris.  Click on the picture to enlarge.  See
Credits.
 
If we assume, for a moment, that this is actually what took place, what would have been the purpose of this unusual activity by the living entities, mentioned above.  Perhaps, the discovery of the flaperon on Reunion Island was meant to give the family and friends of those who lost their lives aboard Flight MH370 evidence that the aircraft did, indeed, crash in the Indian Ocean with the loss of all aboard. However, as stated above, the aircraft, it is believed, did not actually crash in the Indian Ocean.  Although all the passengers and crew aboard the aircraft, with the exception of one, were dead, at some time just prior to time it would have crashed in the ocean, the aircraft was captured by a large spaceship and another disc spaceship that accompanied it and assisted in the capture.  After the Boeing 777 had been moved-possibly by means of transport beams- to the cavernous flight operations area of the large spaceship, certain things took place.  One of these was the removal in a destructive manner of the right flaperon of the right wing of the aircraft. This, as mentioned above, was then cast into the ocean, confident that, with the help of the living entities, it would arrive at Reunion Island seventeen months later.  This would give the family and friends of those who died on Flight MH370 the closure that they needed to end their mourning.

Figure 2.  THe right flaperon of the Boeing 777 that was
operating as Flight MH370 on March 8, 2014, which was
found on the beach at Reunion Island on July 30, 2015.
Note the vague, but still visible, features of the caricature
of a person's head on the surface of the flaperon. 
Click on the picture to enlarge.  See Credits.

It may be noted in Figure 2 that the top flat surface of the flaperon that the four men are carrying possesses a caricature of the left profile of a person’s head.  The profile of this head is formed, in part, by the back and hips of the person located nearest to the person that took the photograph.  The left eye, nose (slightly truncated), and mouth can be seen on this part of the flaperon.  In addition, a band appears to run across the forehead of this caricature beginning above the left eye and continuing to the back of the head.  This, it is believed, could be viewed as a crown of thorns.  If so, the caricature of the head, mentioned above, may be meant to be that of Jesus Christ.  Does this mean that Jesus Christ was involved in the mysterious disappearance of Flight MH370?  Finally, it should be noted that there is a large letter "L" associated with the band that seems to symbolize a crown of thorns.  Could this large letter represent the word Love?

The role of the living entities of an advanced interstellar civilization in the capture of Flight MH370 is described in greater detail in Post 14 of this blog where alignments B, C, D, and E provide symbolic increments of knowledge concerning different aspects of this event.   In this post, Post 20, we shall not discuss all that was discussed in that post concerning these alignments.  We will, however, comment on these alignments as they pertain to the Malaysia Airlines logo that appears in the upper left corner of Figures 3 and 4.  This logo is a picture of the right wing (most likely of a Boeing 777) as viewed from a cabin window.  In the lower right corner of the logo of Figures 1 and 2 are two dark lines.  In Post 14, the symbolic meaning of these two dark lines, and the alignment points associated with them, were stated to be unknown.  However, now that the piece of debris that washed up on Reunion Island has been identified as the right flaperon of the right wing of Flight MH370, the two dark lines appear to be located in the Malaysia Airlines logo where the right flaperon of the aircraft would be expected to be found.  In Figure 4, these two dark lines are designated alignments C and E.  It is these two alignments that we will mostly study in this post.  It also may be noted that the right wing present in the Malaysia Airlines logo, in association with the white clouds present in the logo, resembles the upper half of a disc spaceship as viewed from its rim, an anomaly that was also noted in Post 14.


Figure 3.  Inspired source,"Flight MH370" (Figure 3).
An air traffic control map, depicting aircraft activity
in the vicinity of Kuala Lumpur International Airport
shortly after take-off of Flight MH370 at 00:41 AM
on March 8, 2014.  Courtesy of Flightradar24. Click
on the picture to enlarge.

Figure 4.  Inspired source,"Flight MH370" (Figure 4).
An air traffic control map with alignments A, B, C, D,
and E drawn, depicting aircraft activity in the vicinity
of Kuala Lumpur International Airport shortly after
take-off of Flight MH370.  Courtesy of Flightradar24.
Click on the picture to enlarge.
Alignment C is believed to symbolize the spaceship aspect of the encounter with Flight MH370 that resulted in the capture of the latter.  Likewise, alignment B is believed to symbolize the aircraft aspect of the encounter with the spaceship that resulted in the capture of the former.  A more detailed discussion of this subject is found in post 14 of this blog.  In this post, Post 20, most of the discussion will focus on alignments C and E of Figure 4.  Alignment C begins at point C1 located at the beginning of the dark line that is one of two dark lines present on the right wing at or near the right flaperon in the Malaysia Airlines logo.  Alignment C proceeds to point C2 located at the end of the dark line, mentioned above.  In Post 14, it was stated that the identity or symbolic meaning of the dark line between point C1 and point C2 was not known.  However, in this post, it is believed that this dark line is associated with the right flaperon.  It was the right flaperon that was found on Reunion Island.  Alignment C continues to point C3 located at a corner of a white triangular-shaped feature.  This feature is believed to symbolize a large triangular-shaped spaceship, like the one believed to have captured Flight MH370.  Alignment C terminates at point C4, which is located at the tail of the lower yellow aircraft symbol that is depicted facing another yellow aircraft symbol in proximity to it at point B3 of alignment B.  Alignment B, as noted above, is believed to symbolize the Boeing 777 that was captured by the spaceship somewhere over the southern Indian Ocean.   Alignment B, as noted above, is believed to symbolize the aircraft aspect of the encounter with the spaceship.

Alignment E begins at Point E1 located at the beginning of the dark line that is one of two dark lines present on the right wing at or near the right flaperon in the Malaysia Airlines logo.  Alignment E continues to point E2 located at the end of the dark line, mentioned above.  Once again, in Post 14, it was stated that the identity or symbolic meaning of the dark line between points E1 and E2 was not known. However, in this post, it is believed that it is associated with the right flaperon.  It was the right flaperon that was found of Reunion Island.  After this, alignment E terminates at point E3 located at a grey disc-shaped feature that resembles a disc spaceship. The symbolic mothership of the symbolic disc spaceship appears to be symbolized by the white rectangular box located at the bottom of Figure 4. This white rectangular box is discussed in greater detail in Post 14 of this blog.

Finally, it seems appropriate to conclude this highly anomalous post by noting the coincidence that is believed to exist in the name of the island on which the flaperon of the Boeing 777 was found on July 30, 2015, that is, Reunion Island, and the reunion of the cloned offspring of the passengers and crew (with the possible exception of one of the latter) of Flight MH370 sometime in the near future with the family and friends of their parents.  These parents, of course, are the parents of the cloned offspring who previously had been cloned and died aboard Flight MH370.  As for the one who had the oversight in the capture activity, and probably other associated activities, such as the cloning of the parents of the cloned offspring, is it possible that this individual is the person whose head is depicted in caricature on the bottom surface of the 6 foot piece of debris (but, which is the top surface in Figure 2 because the flaperon is up-side down)?   And is it merely a coincidence that this piece of debris is 6 feet in length, which is about the height of an average man?  However, this person caricaturized in several ways by the flaperon that washed up on the beach on Reunion Island, is considerably more than just an average man.  He, most likely, is Jesus Christ.


Credits:

Reunion Island wing debris is from Flight MH370, Malaysia prime minister says by Kim Willsher, LA Times, August 5, 2015 (http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-experts-france-mh370-20150805-story.html)

Figures 1 and 2 photographs: http://www.trbimg.com/img-55ba3b47/turbine/la-fg-plane-mh370-reunion-island-pictures-2...






Fair Use Notice: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 
This blog distributes this material by means of this blog without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.  We believe this constitutes a fair use for any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.



 

Thursday, September 17, 2015

Post 19. Symbolism Concerning a Spherical Rock Photographed by the Mars Rover, Curiosity, on the Surface of the Gale Crater of Mars on September 11, 2014

An anomaly in the form of a spherical rock was photographed by the Mars rover, Curiosity, on the surface of the Gale Crater on September 11, 2014.  In an article written by Ian O’Neill (HTTP://NEWS.DISCOVERY.COM/IAN-ONEILL.HTM) on September 24, 2014 entitled Curiosity Finds a Weird ‘Ball’ on Mars it was stated that NASA JPL scientists consider this spherical rock to be a Martian haemetite concretion, or a “blueberry” (Figures 1 and 2).  Concretions such as this were formed at a time, when Mars had abundant water and layers of sediment accumulated in the Gale Crater. Over the course of time, the softer sedimentary layers were eroded away leaving behind harder spherical concretions. NASA scientists believe that one of these concretions was transported by wind and gravity to its present location where it was photographed on September 11, 2014 by Curiosity.  However, the spherical rock in Figures 1 and 2 is not as big as it looks. NASA scientists say that it is approximately 1 centimeter in diameter. 
  
 
 Figure 1. The spherical rock photographed by the
Mars rover, Curiosity, in the Gale crater of Mars
on September 11, 2014 with alignments not
drawn for better viewing of the surrounding
terrain features (Courtesy of NASA/JPL-
Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems).

 


 
 
 Figure 2. The spherical rock photographed by the Mars
Rover, Curiosity, in the Gale crater of Mars on
September 11, 2014, with alignments drawn
(Courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space
Science Systems).

Despite this seemingly rational explanation for the presence of this spherical rock on the surface of Mars, it should be noted that there are other terrain features in the photograph taken by Curiosity that can be considered to be anomalous. These terrain features are depicted in Figures 1 and 2.  In Figure 1, no alignments have been drawn on the photograph.  The purpose of this is to allow better viewing of the features of the photograph.  In Figure 2, however, three alignments have been drawn on the photograph.  These alignments are designated alignments A, B, and C.  They reveal that this photograph is an inspired source that possesses symbolic knowledge.  Because this symbolic knowledge is associated with the alignments and their alignment points, they can be studied and their symbolic knowledge revealed.  Figures 1 and 2, it is believed, are  inspired sources.  As in all cases of inspired sources, they are called “inspired” because the symbolism present in these artifacts is believed to be inspired by the Creator, and they are called “sources” because the increments of knowledge transmitted by the symbolism of these artifacts are sources of knowledge.

 We shall now begin the study of Figure 2 and the anomalous terrain features that are believed to be present in this figure.  Hopefully, at the end of this study, we shall arrive at certain conclusions concerning this inspired source and the meaning of its symbolism.  It may be noted that in addition to the spherical rock, there is also present in Figure 2 two circular features that resemble craters, and are about the same diameter as the spherical rock.  The spherical rock, it may be recalled, was determined by NASA scientists to be approximately 1 centimeter in diameter.  Therefore, the two crater-like terrain features, referred to above, are about the same diameter.  Because these two terrain features are similar in diameter to the spherical rock, they can be considered anomalies, and as we shall see, important in understanding the symbolism of Figure 2.

 It also may be noted that the surface rock associated with the two craters and the spherical rock is  exposed above the regolith (soil) in some places.  Although it takes patience and some imagination, it is possible to see in this surface rock the general shape of the continental USA as the latter would be viewed from high above the earth.  In this regard, the crater depicted near the center of Figure 2 can be viewed as located at the northwestern part of the continental USA where the Pacific coasts of Oregon and Washington (including Puget Sound) are found.  From this symbolic coastal area, one can follow the left border of the regolith-free surface rock here downward on Figure 2 along an area of surface rock that symbolizes the Pacific coast of California until reaches the lower end of two anomalous terrain features which together form a feature that resembles the number 8.  This feature that resembles the number 8, it is believed, symbolizes the Baja California, Mexico peninsula.  Therefore, from the location of the crater at the Pacific coasts of Oregon and Washington, one can follow the left border of the regolith-free surface rock downward along the symbolic west coast of California until he reaches the southern tip of the Baja California, Mexico peninsula.

 Turning now to the other crater, this crater is depicted near the right border of Figure 2 and can be viewed as located along the gulf coast of Florida about midway down the Florida peninsula.  However, in another context of symbolism, we shall see that this crater can be viewed as located along the Atlantic coast near New York City, New York City, New York.  And in still another context of symbolism, this crater can be viewed as located on the Atlantic coast of South Carolina.  Therefore, from the coastal area of New York, one can follow the right border of the regolith-free surface rock downward on Figure 2 beyond the Georgia coast until he arrives at the lower end of an anomalous terrain feature that resembles the Florida Peninsula.  This competes a description of the symbolism associated with the anomalous terrain features that are believed to symbolize the western and eastern coasts of continental USA in Figure 2.  The northern and southern borders of the regolith-free surface rock that are believed to symbolize the north and south borders of the continental USA can also be discerned in Figure 2.  However, these areas also describe Canada and Mexico, and the Gulf of Mexico, none of which play an important role in the study of this inspired source.  There is also a regolith-free area of Figure 2 that lies below the southern border of the continental USA.  This area, as we shall see, is believed to symbolize the Florida peninsula, once more.  But this time it is attached to another land mass located east of Florida.  This situation does not exist at the present time.  However, it may exist sometime in the future. With regard to the spherical rock, this terrain feature is depicted in Figure 2 between the two craters, and can be viewed, in one context, as located, symbolically, at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  However, in another symbolic context, the spherical rock can be viewed as located at Chicago, Illinois.  And in still another symbolic context, the spherical rock can be viewed as located at New Madrid, Missouri.

 As noted above, there is believed to be more than one symbolic context concerning the symbolism of the spherical rock and the two craters.  This also applies to some of the other anomalous terrain features present in Figure 2, as well.   In fact, there are believed to be three contexts of symbolism involved in this inspired source.  This view is supported by an anomalous terrain feature, which is present in Figure 2 that resembles the number 3.  This feature is better viewed in Figure 1, which does not possess drawn alignments. This anomalous terrain feature is also the terminus of alignments A, B, and C of Figure 2.  The three symbolic contexts present in Figure 2 that are represented by this anomalous terrain feature that resembles the number 3 in Figure 2 are: (1) a symbolic context that pertains to three meteorite events in the continental USA, (2) a symbolic context that pertains to three weapons of mass destruction events in the continental USA, and (3) a symbolic context that pertains to three earthquake events in the continental USA.  In addition, the anomalous terrain feature that resembles the number 3 also reveals that there are two other things that involve the number three, in addition to the three symbolic contexts, mentioned above. 

These are the three major anomalous terrain features, the spherical rock and the two craters, that are associated with each of the three contexts.  These reveal that each context involves three events and not 4 or 5 events (as would be the case if 4 or 5, instead of 3 major anomalous terrain features, were used in the symbolism). Also, there are three alignments, alignments A, B, and C, that are associated with each symbolic context that enables one to determine the timing, or the order, in which the three events that comprise a context will take place, that is, will they take place first, second, or third.  In this regard, the order in time that these three major anomalous terrain features occur appears to be determined by the three aspects of the terrain feature that resembles the number 3 that are present on its left side, each one of these aspects being the place of termination of one of the alignments of Figure 2.  Therefore, the crater represented by alignment A terminates at the highest aspect of the number 3 of the terrain feature that resembles this number and this indicates that this event occurs first in a designated context.  Likewise, the crater represented by alignment C terminates at the second highest aspect of the number 3 of the terrain feature that resembles this number and this indicates that this event occurs second in a designated context.  Similarly, the spherical rock represented by alignment B terminates at the lowest aspect of the number 3 of the terrain feature that resembles this number and this indicates that this event occurs third in a designated context. 

 We shall now study the first context of symbolism in Figure 2.  In the first context, the spherical rock and the two craters are believed to signify three meteorites that have, or will, strike the earth or disintegrate above the earth somewhere in the continental USA.  The first meteorite event of the first context is represented by the crater located near the right border of Figure 2.  The second meteorite event of the first context is represented by the crater located near the center of Figure 2.  And the third meteorite event is represented by the spherical rock located between the two craters.  The above order in time is based on the criteria, mentioned above, concerning the order in which the three events of the first context take place as this is determined by the terminal alignment points of the three alignments that are associated with the three major anomalous terrain features. Therefore, the first meteorite event of this context is associated with the crater represented by alignment A.  A careful examination of the  terrain features in Figure 2 that surround this crater (the origin of alignment A) reveals a geography that resembles the gulf coast of Florida about midway down the Florida Peninsula. Two cities located near here are Tampa and St. Petersburg. 

 Does this mean a meteorite will strike these cities sometime in the future? This is possible, but prior to this another meteor sighting may take place-one that occurred just recently.   
However, instead of taking place at the surface of the earth, this meteorite event took place in the atmosphere above the earth.  That is too say, the meteor disintegrated in the air before it reached the ground.  This meteor was the fireball that was sighted about 4:50 a.m. February 17, 2015 above Kittanning, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Pittsburgh.  Before disintegrating, this fireball lit up the night sky over Pennsylvania, New York, and Ohio.  It is estimated to have been about 2 feet in diameter and to have weighed about 500 pounds just prior to its disintegration.  The fragments of the fireball were scattered harmlessly east of Kittanning. This meteorite did not cause any destruction or loss of life. If it was not the meteorite symbolized by the spherical rock and alignment B, its purpose may have been to warn mankind on earth-particularly, those living in the continental USA,-that the disasters referred to above are about to begin-and, perhaps, also to provide a hope that they may be rendered harmless by the Creator if man seeks a saving relationship with the Creator through Jesus Christ.   

 Turning to the second meteorite event of the first symbolic context, this event is represented by the crater located near the center of Figure 2.  The second meteorite event of this context is associated with the crater, which is the origin of alignment C.  A careful examination of the surrounding terrain features in Figure 2 reveals that this crater is located on the part of the surface rock that symbolizes the coasts of Oregon and Washington (including Puget Sound).  This would appear to mean that the meteorite event associated with this crater could take place anywhere in the area referred to above.  Although no city in this part of the continental USA appears to be indicated as the location of this meteorite strike, it may be of interest to note that a small fireball or UFO was seen falling into Bellingham Bay, Washington on July 27, 1984 about 03:39 p.m.  The city of Bellingham, Washington is located on Bellingham Bay.  This meteorite event may have taken place too far in the past to be relevant to this study involving the anomalous spherical rock.  However, it is possible that the meteor sighted in 1984 was intended to be a sign from the Creator of a more powerful meteorite event that will take place in the northwestern part of the continental USA sometime in the future.

 The third meteorite event of the first symbolic context is represented by the spherical rock located between the two craters in Figure 2.  The third meteorite event of this context is associated with the spherical rock, which is the origin of alignment B.  A careful examination of the surrounding terrain features in Figure 2 reveals that the spherical rock is located on the part of the surface rock in Figure 2 that symbolizes the confluence of the Monongahela and Allegheny Rivers that form the Ohio River.  Therefore, the third meteorite event of the first context, it is believed, will take place at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as did the meteorite event or fireball, referred to above.

 We shall now study the second context of symbolism in Figure 2.  In the second context, the spherical rock and the two craters are believed to symbolize three weapons of mass destruction that will be used against three cities in the continental USA.  The first event involving a weapon of mass destruction of the second context is represented by the crater located near the right border of Figure 2.  The second event involving a weapon of mass destruction of the second context is represented by the crater located near the center of Figure 2.  And the third event involving a weapon of mass destruction of the second context  is represented by the spherical rock located between the two craters.   As noted above, the order in which the three events of the second context takes place appears to be determined by the terminal alignment points of these three alignments that are located at the terrain feature that resembles the number three. Therefore, the first weapon of mass destruction event of this context is associated with the crater represented by alignment A.  The second weapon of mass destruction event of this context is associated with the crater represented by alignment C.   And the third weapon of mass destruction event of this context is associated with the spherical rock represented by alignment B.

 Before beginning the study of the first weapon of mass destruction event, which is associated with the crater where alignment A originates, it should be noted that the three major anomalous terrain features, that is, the two craters and the spherical rock, which symbolize three weapons of mass destruction may symbolize something more.  If it is assumed that these weapons of mass destruction are three bombs or warheads of some kind, then the two craters may symbolize two weapons that were successfully launched and detonated, while the spherical rock may symbolize a weapon that, for some reason, was not successfully launched and detonated.    As a result, the city that was targeted by this weapon was spared.

 In the second context, the crater associated with alignment A is believed to be located near New York City, New York.  As we have seen, alignment A is the first alignment of the second context and originates at the crater located near the right border of Figure 2.  Alignment C is the second alignment of the second context and originates at the crater located near the center of Figure 2. This crater is symbolically located on the Pacific coasts of Oregon and Washington (including Puget Sound) in the northwest part of the continental USA.  As for this crater, it is assumed that it signifies one of the major cities in this part of the continental USA.  Since Seattle is the major city in this part of the continental USA, it is possible that this city is the one that will struck by a weapon of mass destruction.  This event, when it takes place, will be the second weapon of mass destruction event of the second context.  In the second context, the spherical rock that is associated with alignment B is believed to be located in Illinois, more specifically, Chicago, Illinois.  Although this city, originally, was one of the three cities that was the intended target of a weapon of mass destruction, something apparently took place that prevented this event from taking place.  In this regard, it is possible that the launching place of these weapons of mass destruction will be discovered by US military and this launching place destroyed.  If so, the third weapon of mass destruction, the one destined for Chicago, may be destroyed before it is launched or be diverted off course after its launch.  Alignment B, which originates at the spherical rock, represents the third event of the second symbolic context.

 The above symbolism seems to indicate that weapons of mass destruction, apparently, will be used against the USA in the second symbolic context, referred to above.  However, it is not known, for certain, who will launch these attacks, how they will accomplished this, and from where on earth these weapons will be launched.  However, answers to these questions may be revealed by a study of the symbolism of an anomalous terrain features in Figure 2.  This terrain feature can be identified by its angular shape, its color, which is black (a result of its being in shadow), and by the three alignment points that are found here.  These points are A2, B2, and C2 of alignments A, B, and C.

 If the exposed surface rock located in Figure 2 above the exposed surface rock believed to symbolize the USA can be viewed as symbolizing Canada, then the large expanse of regolith above the surface rock represented by Canada can be viewed as symbolizing the waters of the Arctic Ocean.  Now, returning to the angular, black anomalous terrain feature, mentioned above, we might ask, “what does this object resemble?”  If we can answered this question, then perhaps we may be able determine what this anomalous terrain feature symbolizes, as well.  The initial impression of the writer is that this angular, black object sticking out of the regolith (the latter, symbolizing the waters of the Arctic Ocean) is that this rock resembles the dorsal fin of a  shark.  Some may feel that this rock resembles a mythical sea monster with the right side of his head in view and its mouth open. Others may  see in this object, a submarine broaching the surface of the water following a dive.   If the latter is the case, it is possible that the three weapons that will be launched may come from a submerged submarine in the Arctic Ocean.  This could the work of a rogue captain and crew involved in a  desperate attempt to influence the world political order in some way.   Or, it could involve an advanced interstellar civilization making its appearance known on earth at this time-a civilization that, until this time, man did not know existed on earth. 

 In the third symbolic context, the two craters and the spherical rock symbolize great earthquakes of a magnitude of 8 and 11 on the Richter scale.  Three or more of these earthquakes will, apparently, strike the continental USA, in conjunction with the third context.   These great earthquakes, undoubtedly, will initiate other earthquakes, which, presumably, will be of lesser magnitude.  In this context, the first great earthquake to strike the continental USA, it is believed, is symbolized by the crater associated with alignment A.  This crater, depending on one’s interpretation, can be viewed as being located at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the Atlantic coast of New York adjacent to New York City, or the Atlantic coast of South Carolina   However the view taken by the writer is that this crater, in this context, is located at or near Charleston, South Carolina.  Here, also, point A1 of alignment A is located.  Adjacent to the lower end of the crater there are found two faint circular anomalous terrain features that resemble the number 8.  This, it is believed, refers to an earthquake of magnitude 8 that will strike this part of the coast of South Carolina and become the first earthquake event of the third context.   This city, Charleston, South Carolina, and the seismic zone associated with that city, which is called the Middleton Place-Summerville Seismic Zone, is a place where large earthquakes have occurred in the past.  The last major earthquake that occurred here was a 7.3 magnitude earthquake, which occurred in 1886.  Presumably, this seismic zone is capable of producing a magnitude 8 earthquake, also.

 The second great earthquake to strike the continental USA, it is believed, is symbolized by the crater associated with alignment C.  This is the second of the three great earthquakes that will strike the continental USA in the third context.  This crater, as we have seen, can be viewed as being located along the coast of Oregon and Washington (including Puget Sound) in the northwestern part of the continental USA.  It may be noted that within the crater, there appears to be found a feature that is black and resembles a carelessly drawn number 8.  This may indicate that the magnitude of the earthquake that will strike this part of the continental USA, will be an 8.  Here, also, point C1 of alignment C is located.  If one extrapolates alignment C downward on Figure 2 from alignment point C1, it may be noted that it intersects another anomalous terrain feature that resembles the number eight, also.   This point of intersection is located about where the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego, California would be expected to be located on a map of southern California.  Both, Oregon and Washington, as well as California, are the location of major seismic faults.  For the former, it is the Cascadia Subduction Zone and for the latter it is the San Andreas Fault.  This inspired source may be revealing that the two major faults, mentioned above, are linked and when one of the faults experiences a major earthquake, it is likely that the other will experience a major earthquake, also.

 The third great earthquake to strike the continental USA, it is believed, is symbolized by the spherical rock associated with alignment B.  This is the third of the three great earthquakes that will strike in the third symbolic context.  This spherical rock, as we have seen, can be viewed as being located in Pennsylvania or Illinois and is symbolically associated with Pittsburgh and Chicago in those states. However, in this context, the spherical rock is believed to symbolize a location in eastern Missouri near New Madrid, Missouri.  Here, the most active earthquake activity associated with the New Madrid Seismic Zone takes place.  In this, the third context, the anomalous terrain feature that resembled the Allegheny River in the first and third meteorite events of the first context, can now be seen as an anomalous terrain feature that symbolically resembles the Mississippi River flowing north to south to the right of the spherical rock.  The spherical rock is represented by alignment B in Figure 2 and, in this context, is symbolically located at New Madrid, Missouri.  It may be noted that an anomalous terrain feature that resembles the number 11 is found adjacent to and below the spherical rock.  This number 11, it is believed, indicates that the magnitude of the earthquake that will take place along the New Madrid Seismic Zone at that time will be an 11

 Most geologists believe that an earthquake of magnitude 9 on the Richter scale is the highest magnitude possible.  They feel that the earth’s crust and must break and fracture, when subjected to the force of an earthquake having a magnitude of 9. But here and elsewhere in inspired sources, the number 11 is symbolized in Richter scale magnitudes.  Therefore, it is possible that a Richter scale magnitude of 11, not 9, may be the most powerful earthquake that can be experienced on earth.  The New Madrid Seismic zone, or New Madrid Fault Line, was responsible for the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes. This seismic zone had four of the largest North American earthquakes in recorded history with magnitudes estimated to be as large as 8, all occurring within a three month period between December 11, 1811 and February 1812.  Geologists believe this seismic zone may have the potential to produce large earthquakes, again. The 150 mile long fault system extends into several states, stretching southward from Cairo, Illinois, to New Madrid, Missouri, and continuing into Tennessee and Arkansas

 At this time, we shall briefly discuss the alignments that are present in Figure 2. These, as we have seen, are alignments A, B, and C.  Alignment A begins at point A1 located at the crater depicted near the right border of Figure 2, proceeds to point A2 located at the upper aspect of the angular, black rock  (in shadow) that rises out of the regolith, and terminates at point A3 located at a terrain feature in the distance that resembles the number 3.  Alignment B begins at point B1 located at the spherical rock, proceeds to point B2 located at the intermediate aspect of the angular, black (in shadow) rock that rises out of the regolith, and terminates at point B3 located at a terrain feature in the distance that resembles the number 3.  Alignment C begins at point C1 located at the crater depicted near the center of the Figure 2, proceeds to point C2 located at the lower aspect of the angular, black (in shadow) that rises out of the regolith, and terminates at point C3 located at a terrain feature in the distance that resembles the number 3.

 If one extrapolates alignment B downward in Figure 2, this will result in the alignment proceeding from point B1 at the spherical rock to the upper aspect of two exposed surface rocks.  One of these resembles the Florida Peninsula and the other is the large surface rock that is situated beside the surface rock that resembles the Florida Peninsula.  Symbolically, this may mean that the earth upheavals at this time, that is, during the time of the third earthquake event of the third context, will cause the Atlantic Ocean seafloor between the Bahama Islands and the Florida Peninsula to undergo a rise in elevation and emerge from the Atlantic Ocean.  At the northern aspect of this newly formed land, the latter may join or nearly join the land that is referred to as the Florida Peninsula and the Atlantic coast of Georgia.  Is there any other evidence that indicates that a portion of the Atlantic Ocean seafloor off the present-day Atlantic coast of Florida and Georgia will emerge from the sea?  It may be noted that in 1940 the clairvoyant E. Cayce, while in a trance, stated that certain areas of the western Atlantic Ocean seafloor would rise out of the ocean. His exact words concerning this subject were:

                                 Poseidia will be among the first portions of Atlantis to
                                 rise again-expect it in ’68 and ’69-not so far away.  (Edgar
                                 Cayce reading: 958-3 ©1971, 1993-2007 by the Edgar
                                 Cayce Foundation.  All Rights Reserved.)

Although many have commented on this reading and wondered why the event stated in the reading did not come to pass in 1968 and 1969, perhaps the fault is not in the reading but in the reader of this reading.  In this regard, perhaps he needs to view the reading from a fresh point of view.  If he does, he may discover that this prediction does not contradict the conclusions of this study, and, in particular, those that pertain to the third earthquake event of the third context of the symbolism of this inspired source. 


Credits: 

O'Neill, Ian: Curiosity Finds a Weird Ball on Mars, http://news.discovery.com/space/curiosity-finds-a-weird-ball-on-mars-140924.htm






Fair Use Notice: This post may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. 
This blog distributes this material by means of this blog without profit to those who have expressed an interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.  We believe this constitutes a fair use for any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.